翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Calder High School ・ Calder Highway ・ Calder Houses ・ Calder Memorial Trophy ・ Calder Park ・ Calder Park Raceway ・ Calder Park, Aberdeen ・ Calder Park, Victoria ・ Calder Publishing ・ Calder Quartet ・ Calder Race Course ・ Calder River (Victoria) ・ Calder River (Western Australia) ・ Calder v British Columbia (AG) ・ Calder v. Bull ・ Calder v. Jones ・ Calder Vale ・ Calder Valley (UK Parliament constituency) ・ Calder Valley Line ・ Calder Willingham ・ Calder's Geo ・ Calder's set for Socrate ・ Calder, Cumbria ・ Calder, Edmonton ・ Calder, Idaho ・ Calder, Saskatchewan ・ Calder, West Yorkshire ・ Caldera ・ Caldera (album) ・ Caldera (band) Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Calder v. Jones ： ウィキペディア英語版 Calder v. Jones ''Calder v. Jones'', 465 U.S. 783 (1984), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a court within a state could assert personal jurisdiction over the author and editor of a national magazine which published an allegedly libelous article about a resident of that state, and where the magazine had wide circulation in that state. ==Facts== The plaintiff, actress Shirley Jones (represented by Paul Ablon), sued the defendants, the ''National Enquirer'', its distributor, the writer of the article, and Calder, the editor-in-chief of the magazine, over an October 9, 1979 article in which the ''Enquirer'' alleged that Jones was an alcoholic. Jones lived in California, and although the ''Enquirer'' article had been written and edited in Florida, Jones filed her lawsuit in a California state court. Jones asserted that the court had jurisdiction based on the large circulation ''Enquirer'' enjoyed in California - selling over 600,000 copies each week out of a total national circulation of about 5,000,000 copies per week. The publisher and the distributor did not object to jurisdiction in California. The trial court dismissed the claim as to the author and editor on the grounds that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants, basing this finding on First Amendment concerns that permitting jurisdiction in such cases would chill free speech. The California Court of Appeal reversed, and the Supreme Court of California affirmed the appellate court's ruling. Calder appealed, as did the writer of the article, contending that the writer and editor of a magazine article were like welders of a boiler part. In such a case, although the manufacturer of the product could be held liable in another state where the product caused an injury, a worker who had neither a stake in the distribution nor any control over it would not be held liable in that state. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Calder v. Jones」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.